Skip to content

The hidden cost of cultural pressure at work

Dr. Amy Narishkin

By AMY NARISHKIN, Ph.D.

Across industries, exhaustion is often treated as an individual problem, a resilience issue, a time-management issue, or a personal leadership challenge. But what if leaders are diagnosing the symptom rather than the cause?

Recently, I spoke with a colleague who is a leadership consultant like me. Near the end of our conversation, she shared that she was feeling burned out. She didn’t say it dramatically. She simply admitted that she was exhausted and longed for a break. “I really need to unplug,” she told me. “I want to sit by a pool and read a book.”

As we talked, something became clear. The challenge wasn’t that she didn’t want rest. The challenge was that she didn’t quite know how to take it. Even the idea of stepping away felt complicated.

I asked if it would be helpful to offer her some cultural context around what she was experiencing so that it didn’t feel so personal.

She immediately said yes.

How culture impacts us

I explained that in the United States, we live in a culture that places a high value on productivity, achievement, and output. Over time, those values become internalized. We begin to equate our worth with what we produce. If we are not accomplishing something, we can start to feel as though we are falling behind.

Much of U.S. business culture is task-oriented, where trust and value are tied to results, reliability, and performance. In other cultures, trust is built more through relationships, connection, and empathy.

Neither approach is inherently better, but they create very different expectations about how people work, communicate, and even rest.

I offered her a simple observation: “What you’re feeling is not a character defect. It’s a cultural default.” She paused and said, “That makes sense.”

That moment captures a leadership challenge I see frequently. When people believe exhaustion is entirely personal, they try to solve it personally. They push harder, become more efficient, or attempt to optimize their recovery. Yet if the pressure itself is cultural, individual effort alone cannot fully solve the problem.

This distinction matters for organizations. Leaders often respond to burnout by investing in resilience training or encouraging employees to practice better self-care. Those efforts can help. But if the culture continues rewarding constant availability, nonstop productivity, and overwork, the underlying pressure remains unchanged.

A different approach

I said, “Instead of trying to unplug for an entire week, what if you practiced unplugging for five minutes? Five minutes without productivity. Five minutes without input. Just a few moments of intentional space.”

She said, “That could be surprisingly attainable.”

Her response reminded me of a woman I once coached who worked as a bank teller while supporting three generations of her family. Vacation time was limited, lunch breaks were short, and stepping away from responsibilities felt nearly impossible. Rather than focusing on what she couldn’t do, we explored what was possible. She began taking a few quiet minutes during the day to breathe, reflect, and reset. Over time, those small practices helped her feel more grounded and more capable of managing the demands she faced.

The lesson is not that five minutes solves burnout. The lesson is that sustainable change often begins with realistic actions rather than ideal ones.

Why this matters

This matters because rest is not the opposite of productivity. It is one of the conditions that supports sustained productivity. Without opportunities to recover, decision fatigue increases, focus declines, creativity narrows, and errors become more likely.

Research from Gallup has found that burnout contributes to lower productivity, increased absenteeism, and higher turnover, creating significant costs for organizations. In high-performance environments, where expectations are high and work feels relentless, these pressures can become so normalized that leaders stop noticing them.

Before concluding that an employee lacks resilience, discipline, or commitment, leaders should ask a different question: “What cultural pressures might be shaping this behavior?”

That question shifts the conversation. People stop viewing themselves as the problem and begin examining the systems influencing their choices. Leaders gain a clearer understanding of the environment they are creating and the messages that environment sends about success, value, and performance.

This is where culturally intelligent leadership matters. It helps leaders recognize how cultural systems influence behavior through emotional safety, relationships, and unspoken expectations. When leaders understand those forces, they can create conditions that support both performance and well-being.

The cost of ignoring cultural pressure is not simply burnout. It is diminished focus, reduced productivity, preventable turnover, and lost leadership effectiveness.

Sometimes the shift does not begin with a week off. Sometimes it begins with five minutes, and a leader willing to question the cultural assumptions driving the pressure in the first place.

Human behavior makes more sense when we understand the cultural systems shaping it.

 


This Cultural Intelligence Micro Practice offers a simple framework for uncovering those systems and responding with greater clarity, curiosity, and effectiveness. Download the Cultural Intelligence Micro Practice.

Dr. Amy Narishkin helps results-oriented CEOs fix systems impacting behavior so they can reduce friction and keep their best people. She can be reached at [email protected].

Leave a Comment